Search for: "Posner v. Posner" Results 1561 - 1580 of 1,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-10591, involving the dispute between Judges Wilkinson and Posner over what “sexual activity” means for the crime of enticing a minor, the Justices said “Aw, Fugit” and moved on. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 9:46 am by Venkat
The court cites to a Judge Posner opinion and concludes that if enforced as drafted, “absurd results would ensue. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:54 am
" Similarly, Chief Judge Posner held in People Who Care v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:22 pm by Orin Kerr
New York was a case involving content rather than non-content information; and Judge Posner’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:10 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
  A simple question, perhaps, but one the Court is poised to decide in Sandifer v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(Note that we do interfere with belief in the placebo effect, even per Posner.) [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
After all, the background of Marbury v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
Judge Posner and a divided 7th Circuit said yes. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Matthew Finkin
The CaseCalifornia’s Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) allows an employee “aggrieved” by a violation of state’s wage, hour, and wage payment law to obtain civil penalties “on behalf of himself and other current or former employees. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In arguing otherwise, Disney relies on Judge Posner's opinion in  Fraternal Order of Police Hobart Lodge No. 121 v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Zak Gowen
By Wyatt Fore   [Draft] Guideline 12: Acquisitions of partial control or common ownership may in some situations substantially lessen competition.[1]   Portfolio investors may soon find that their investments could be the subject of increased antitrust scrutiny, resulting from new federal enforcement guidelines. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 160 F.3d 358, 359–60 (7th Cir. 1998) (Posner, C.J.) [read post]