Search for: "Soling v. New York State"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 3,659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 4:49 am
The decision devotes but a single sentence to its rationale for relieving the two shareholders of liability: The Supreme Court also should not have found liability on the part of Tehseldar and Tartir, who were corporate principals of the corporate defendants, because one of the primary legitimate purposes of incorporating is to limit or eliminate the personal liability of corporate principals (see Bartle v Home Owners Coop., 309 NY 103, 106), and the court did not find that they… [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:00 am
In 1999, the New York Court of Appeals decided BDO Seidman v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 4:00 am
Imposing a "disciplinary probation period" as part of the penalty or settlement of a disciplinary actionWoods v State Univ. of N.Y., 2016 NY Slip Op 04084, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe genesis of Woods v State University of New York [SUNY], was Norman Woods being served with a notice of discipline issued in accordance with the terms of the collective bargaining agreement [CBA] negotiated by State and Woods’… [read post]
24 May 2016, 12:34 pm
At trial, the jury awarded plaintiff a lot of money: $541,000.00 on her New York State disability discrimination claim, which the trial judge reduced to $440,000.00. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:20 pm
’s father and stepmother, pending a custody determination by New York State. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:00 am
Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times writes a heart-breaking story (Until Medical Bills Do Us Part) of elderly friends who were faced with filing divorce over medical bills. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:04 pm
Marlow v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:00 am
For example, in Erwin v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:59 am
” Woods also cautioned: “Employers also should remember that Spokeo does not diminish state and local mini-FCRA requirements (e.g., the California ICRAA, New York’s Article 23-A, and New York City’s Fair Chance Act); as with the federal FCRA (especially until we see how lower courts will interpret Spokeo), employers should continue to be vigilant in complying with these local, state, and federal requirements. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
He was the sole occupant of the automobile. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:34 pm
” Woods also cautioned: “Employers also should remember that Spokeo does not diminish state and local mini-FCRA requirements (e.g., the California ICRAA, New York’s Article 23-A, and New York City’s Fair Chance Act); as with the federal FCRA (especially until we see how lower courts will interpret Spokeo), employers should continue to be vigilant in complying with these local, state, and federal requirements. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:34 pm
” Woods also cautioned: “Employers also should remember that Spokeo does not diminish state and local mini-FCRA requirements (e.g., the California ICRAA, New York’s Article 23-A, and New York City’s Fair Chance Act); as with the federal FCRA (especially until we see how lower courts will interpret Spokeo), employers should continue to be vigilant in complying with these local, state, and federal requirements. [read post]
15 May 2016, 5:51 pm
”’ Nardiello v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 3:20 am
Courts in other states have held that the right to counsel attaches to the decision to submit to a breathalyzer test, including Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, and New York. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:26 pm
The unanimous judgment in Novikova and others v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 12:49 pm
Weeks before Uber’s proposed $100M settlement of misclassification claims designed to protect the company’s business model, a federal district court in New York ruled that the CEO and co-founder of the now-ubiquitous rideshare app must defend class allegations that he orchestrated and facilitated an illegal price-fixing conspiracy with Uber drivers. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:43 am
New York State Department of Labor, decided on April 26. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:02 pm
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
That problem just got much bigger with the Fourth Circuit’s decision in G.G. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am
Genovese is a reminder that New York’s LLC Law, unlike LLC statutes in a number of other states, has no default rule authorizing member expulsion. [read post]
