Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 1561 - 1580 of 3,526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2013, 9:22 am by Howard Friedman
In New Jersey, a superseding criminal complaint (full text) was issued yesterday in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:08 am by John A. Sakson
This antiquated law has caused numerous unjust results, and ultimately caused the New Jersey Supreme Court to engage in Solomon – like behavior in an attempt to reconcile a very difficult situation, in Green v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Gregoris, No. 2:16-cv-6255, out of the District of New Jersey. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
United States, the Supreme Court ruling that refused to apply the exclusionary rule to an unlawful search that resulted from a police agency's failure to remove a withdrawn warrant from its database: In one of the first trial court decisions to interpret Herring, a federal judge in New Jersey took the broader view, refusing to suppress evidence obtained from computer hard drives under a search warrant based on false information supplied by a Secret… [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:33 am by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
As to the husband’s First Amendment arguments, the Court referred to the three prong test under the United States Supreme Court case of Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 4:37 pm
The Court's briefing order is available here, and a post containing the briefs filed last week by Kennedy and the United States is available here.Former New Jersey Supreme Court Justice and Attorney General Peter Verniero has the OpEd, "To maintain its integrity, the court must own up," in Sunday's Newark Star-Ledger. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:55 pm by Patricia Salkin
Constitution, but the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found against them. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:53 am
  The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (the “District Court”) previously dismissed the class action based on the running of the statute of limitations. [read post]