Search for: "State v. A. Johnson" Results 1561 - 1580 of 8,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by Richard Hunt
Johnson v Starbucks – the saga continues Johnson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Washington Blade, Chris Johnson reports that the florist “[c]ontend[s] the state attorney general had clear anti-religion bias in pursuing the case against her. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
” On the second point, the authorization for committee staff to question witnesses is an exercise of Rule XI, clause 2(j)(2)(C) of the House rules, which states that committees may so authorize staff. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:17 pm by Mikhaila Fogel
Quinta Jurecic posted the government and President Trump’s motion to dismiss in House Ways and Means Committee v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Genus Lifesciences Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Schramm & Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko, Germany v Italy Marta Carneiro, Kirsten Ketscher & Freya Semanda, Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and others Sara Bengtson, Damian Gonzalez-Salzberg, Loveday Hodson & Paul Johnson, Christine Goodwin v the United Kingdom Amel Alghrani, Amal Ali & Jill Marshall, Leyla Sahin v Turkey Nicola Barker, Burden v the United… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
This approach is more in keeping with the presidential system in, for example, the United States, and not consistent with the Westminster form of government, in which an election can occur at any time, with the approval of the Governor General. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
For the G7 the language is grounded in the principles of the collective imperium built around the United Nations system and its community of states lead by a vanguard group of powerful states. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm by Peter Margulies
Receiving asylum is difficult, in part because of the requirement noted by the Supreme Court in INS v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Statler of the Lemoyne, PA law firm of Johnson, Duffie, Stewart & Weidner for bringing this Pacheco v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:49 am by Peter E. Harrell
What’s more, the Supreme Court gutted Congress’s ability to veto presidential actions under IEEPA with its 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 11:48 am by Jon Sands
Johnson, 920 F.3d 628 (9th Cir. 2019), the court looks to the designation given by the state and how it is treated. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Department of Commerce (nikkikalbing@gmail.com) The Future of Law in British Africa on the Eve of IndependenceRabiat Akande, Harvard Law School (oakande@sjd.law.harvard.edu) Marginalizing "Secularism," Decolonizing the State: Missionary Advocacy for Religious Freedom in British Colonial Northern Nigeria, 1945-1960Terence Mashingaidze, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe (mashingaidzet@staff.msu.ac.zw) Constitutionalism and Ritual Controversies in a… [read post]