Search for: "U. S. v. Doe"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 5,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2008, 10:10 am
S. 41 at 45–46 (1957); Smith v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
In O’Connor v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
S. 323, 334, 348 (1974)); see also Bose Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:57 am
If the Supreme Court does indeed overturn Roe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm
Ice, 555 U. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:42 am
From this just-completed Term of the Supreme Court, a clear example is the Court’s 5-4 decision in Clapper v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:46 am
Like last term’s decision of City of Ontario v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
(David Post) For those of you interested in this sort of thing or this issue, I’ve written (along with Annemarie Bridy at U Idaho) a “Law Professors’ Amicus Brief” in the appeal (before the 2d Circuit in NYC) in the Viacom et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 6:20 am
AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:55 am
Campbell v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:08 am
The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf had to decide whether five different trousers from Nike with different stripe patterns infringed adidas’ three stripes pattern (I-20 U 120/23). [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Inability to demonstrate the possession of a required license permits the summary termination of an incumbentMatter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2009 NY Slip Op 51164(U), Decided on May 15, 2009, Supreme Court, Erie County, Judge Paula L. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
Unwired Planet challenged Birss J's assumption that it held a dominant position (which would be necessary for Huawei v ZTE to apply). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:33 am
The State’s first move will be to argue that such searches were conducted in good faith reliance on existing precedent, namely State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:04 pm
The U. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Copyright Fair Use Opinions, 1978–2005, 156 U. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
[FN1] It is well settled that, "[u]nder FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection" (Matter of Empire Ch. of Associated Bldrs. and Contractors, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Transportation, ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 06852, *1 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:17 am
The first alleges that, had defendants acted competently, no investigation of plaintiffs would have been reported on their Form U-5’s, or, at least, “the U5’s would have been filed with more favorable language than the language which eventually ended up in the U-5’s. [read post]
