Search for: "United States v. Adam"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,881
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2010, 6:59 am
The United States was not at war at that time, the British soldiers Adams agreed to represent were not non-uniformed terrorists, and those soldiers were defendants in a criminal trial. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm
Bull, research director of the Administrative Conference of the United States; Colleen V. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant of impeding the administration of the tax code, the government must prove that the defendant knew of or could have foreseen a tax-related proceeding. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
The AG's motion was granted based on the Court of Appeals' Adams ruling.Just prior to the beginning of her criminal trial, Likine's attorney moved for reconsideration of Judge McDonald's evidentiary ruling; this time arguing that precluding her from presenting evidence of her "ability to pay" and of her employment history, violated Likine's constitutional Due Process rights under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
The AG's motion was granted based on the Court of Appeals' Adams ruling.Just prior to the beginning of her criminal trial, Likine's attorney moved for reconsideration of Judge McDonald's evidentiary ruling; this time arguing that precluding her from presenting evidence of her "ability to pay" and of her employment history, violated Likine's constitutional Due Process rights under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.… [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am
In Kiobel, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissing a complaint filed under the ATS. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 8:16 am
Adams, Esq [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Drawing from comparative analysis and federal theory, we argue that elements of federal solidarity are readily identifiable in the United States and that conceiving of them as such helps to clarify doctrine, for example, around the dormant commerce clause and interstate sovereign immunity. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am
Adam Schiff’s remarks at the Brookings Institution last Tuesday. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am
United States, a case involving the “anti-harboring” provision in Alabama’s 2011 immigration law, which made it a crime to help undocumented immigrants enter or live in the state. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Indeed, one expert in the employ of the United States government, who would go on to become a major testifying expert witness for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation, opined in a 1973 publication, that mesothelioma was a problem limited to exposure to South African crocidolite, which was not in every asbestos-containing insulation product.[9] In any event, Judge Wisdom never directly addressed Section 388, and the framing of the Borel case as a consumer case prevailed. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
See also Adam Wagner’s post: Do we need a UK Bill of Rights? [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
Samizdat and an Independent Society in Central and Eastern Europe (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1989). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear an important electronic privacy case, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:10 am
"The basic defect of the Adam Walsh Act, as applied, is that it imposes a mandatory limit on freedom of an accused without permitting an 'adversary hearing,'" Weinstein held in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm
That small group includes George Washington’s chief of staff, a future United States president, and a controversial New York state politician. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
In Matal v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:37 am
Russell KNAGGS and Ramzy KHACHIK v the United Kingdom – 46559/06 [2011] ECHR 1328 (30 August 2011) European Court of Human Rights: refusal to admit intercept evidence in court proceedings not breach of human rights. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:22 pm
United States Inc. v. [read post]
