Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm
Texas); and rejected (unanimously) the continued vitality of much-cited dicta from the Court’s 1934’s United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 4:11 am
KGK argued that the Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because SourceOne did not, and could not name the co-owner of KGK's patent, the United States government. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:20 pm
Holder and Guerrero-Lasprilla v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:24 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeDisclosed Citizen's Corroborated Tip Supported Finding of Reasonable Suspicion to Stop Defendant United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
Holder and Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
On June 19, 2009, in Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:14 pm
On June 19, 2009, in Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
In De Grandpré Chait v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:28 pm
In Citizens United, on the other hand, Roberts joined the majority in refusing to adopt a narrowing construction of the statute, and authored a concurring opinion stating that the Court should not adopt a narrow decision just because it is narrow, but that it “must also be right. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:10 am
Golan v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
After Beasley’s failed petitions to cancel Howard’s USPT, Beasley filed a suit in the United States District Court of New Jersey under the Lanham Act, alleging an infringement claim against Howard. [read post]
SCOTUS Ducking the Trump Eligibility Question Now will Pressure the Court to Rule in his Favor Later
16 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:58 am
Wickard v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:59 am
”’ Holder v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:59 am
Copyright holders argue that the phrase means simply not manufactured in the United States, while importers like Kirtasaeng argue that it means subject to the copyright laws of the United States, as in a manufacturer licensed by the holder of a U.S. registered work. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
Holder. [read post]
