Search for: "United States v. Michigan"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court in Berghuis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 10:46 am
United States (10-5443) Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 3:03 am
This extension is in response to the Supreme Court ruling that federal benefits cannot be limited based on a definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman, which was reached last year in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:49 pm
The Court held that the double-jeopardy provisions of the Michigan and United States Constitutions were not violated because these two crimes have different elements. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:15 pm
For the first time in our nation's history, three women will be sitting together on the bench of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:30 am
After receiving help, he thought he was free of those issues, but they returned when he began working for the United States Customs and Border Protection Agency. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:46 am
” Nicholas Stephanopolous writes at the Election Law Blog that last week’s ruling by a federal court in Michigan “that twenty-seven Michigan state house, state senate, and congressional districts are unconstitutional partisan gerrymanders” reveals that “while the Supreme Court continues to debate the issue” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Rucho v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 171 (1974). [2] Michigan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court has cautioned that this rule does not relieve a pro se litigant of the obligation to follow a court's procedural rules …. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
The Court relied heavily on its 1986 ruling in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
Oct 3: National Mining Association (NMA) President and CEO Hal Quinn announced that the association was filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration and stay and petition for review of U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 5:02 am
He very kindly agreed, and passes along this: The criminal prosecution in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
Ohio, the Texas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am
This is largely deliberate, reflecting the relatively low priority that inconvenient racial equality is typically accorded by United States culture. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:27 am
(Libertarian Party of Michigan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, upholding Michigan’s ban on the use of affirmative action by public universities in that state. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
The term of the consent decree is seven years.The case is U.S. and State of Texas v. [read post]
