Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 6,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 9:13 am
But Kochel said Trump still has the simplest message to voters about the Supreme Court ruling: 'You’re welcome.'... [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:28 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Certain kinds of electioneering materials may be banned at and near polling places on election day; that’s what the Court held in Burson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:37 am
In the case McGOVERN v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:41 pm
Lemons v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:51 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a California voter initiative [Proposition 8] stripping same sex couples of the right to marry is unconstitutional. [read post]
5 May 2011, 12:06 pm
Higgins v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
California voters passed Proposition 12 in 2018. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
The Massachusetts ban on corporate speech regarding various ballot measures (A), which was struck down in First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:27 pm
As Rick Hasen covers in detail, today the Seventh Circuit issued opinions explaining its recent 5-5 division over whether to stay an injunction against Wisconsin’s voter ID law. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:38 pm
Adding to the issue is the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
US District Judge Roger Benitez based his decision on the US Supreme Court’s holding in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:44 am
Well, Texas voters, you can’t say that the trial lawyers didn’t warn you this would happen. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:07 am
Citing his alleged fealty to the Constitution and the rule of law, they urged Alabama voters to support him. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:01 am
Based on long-standing Supreme Court precedent (the Reno v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
(For more on this, see Chambers v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 6:06 am
In Genser v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:11 am
As Justice Rylaarsdam's opinion cogently explains, it'd be silly -- absurd, even -- to adopt such a principle.But the trial court nonetheless thought that that's exactly what the voters did when they said (in the California Constitution) that a judge of a court of record is ineligible for public employment "during the term for which the judge is seated. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
In Trump v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 12:51 pm
Perry v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
Under the California Constitution, a voter initiative can lead to a simple amendment, but not to a revision. [read post]
