Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 8,030
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2012, 2:42 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:54 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Town of Castle Rock v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:24 am
Additional Resources: Marks v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:31 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 7:18 pm
Justices Corrigan, Markman, and Young dissented, stating that the "new majority" was ignoring (rather than overruling) settled precedent, such as Thornton v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
In C.A. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
YOUNG, JR. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:46 am
This milestone in US history is observed by Americans, young and old, as a national holiday. [read post]
27 May 2012, 11:42 am
The Court remanded the matter to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of this issue in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent holding in Howe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:17 am
The CCA cited the reasoning of the Supreme Court in the case of Georgia v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:10 am
I have done several posts on this blog (here, here, here, here, here, and here) about the inaccuracy of regular and cross-racial eyewitness identifications and whether expert testimony about this inaccuracy should be allowed. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:38 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 5:19 am
In her paper, Professor Lampley discusses the methods a court may utilize to examine the potentially prohibitive costs associated with pursing individual arbitration following recent United States Supreme Court precedent in American Express Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 2:37 pm
State here. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 12:44 am
The name of the case is Eskin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
case=6291421178853922648&q=miller+v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
case=6291421178853922648&q=miller+v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:25 am
On Friday, Chief Justice Roberts signed an Order halting discovery and the trial scheduled to begin October 29 in Juliana v. [read post]
