Search for: "Ace v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 1,870
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Emma Kent
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
To take one random example, see Johnson v Unisys [2013] 1 AC 518, in which the House of Lords held that it was not permissible to bring a common law claim for breach of contract which would sidestep the restrictions on the statutory unfair dismissal regime. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
The basis on which equity grants relief from the strict enforcement of a forfeiture is that it regards the forfeiture as only a security for the performance of an underlying obligation: see Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding (1973) AC 691, 723-724 per Lord Wilberforce, recently affirmed by this court in Vauxhall Motors Ltd (formerly General Motors UK Ltd) v Manchester Ship Canal Co Ltd (2019) UKSC 46; (2020) AC 1161, para 17. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:34 am by SHG
Franklin also owns several firearms, which the Government contends “have long been recognized as being ‘tools of the drug trade.'” [Doc. 87 at 6 n.2 (quoting in part United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:03 pm by Amy Howe
The ACE Rule gave states discretion in setting standards and gave power plants flexibility in complying with those standards. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The effect of s97 is limited to the life of proceedings (Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2007] 1 FLR 1). [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am by SW
  At the other end of the spectrum, he compared this case to R v SSHD ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 at 131 E-F where there was an issue of legality, and government was legislating in a manner that was contrary to fundamental human rights. [read post]