Search for: "All members of Administrative Review Board" Results 141 - 160 of 4,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
The post Week in Review first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:04 pm by Katelynn Catalano
The law required each public corporation headquartered in California to include at least one member from an underrepresented community on its board, with an increasing requirement based on board size. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
Finally, we recap all The Regulatory Review series published over the course of this past calendar year. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
In the late 1930s, when federal courts appeared reluctant to vindicate equal protection claims, the federal Social Security Board (later to become part of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare) took a more active role via its administration of federal grants for state-run public welfare programs. [read post]
30 May 2018, 10:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
It is critical that all involved (administrators, teachers, staff members and parents) feel that the Ombudsman Office is working independently and, in a manner, consistent with its mission. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
The post Week in Review first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
  From there, an appeal may be taken to the Benefits Review Board (“BRB”), and then to the appropriate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
On Tuesday, I reproduced Part II, on why “Texas Administrative-Law Judicial Review Is Not Active Supervision”. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:08 pm by Sam Wong
The Supreme Court held that the head of the Patent and Trademark Office must have the ability to review decisions issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, which includes members who are Administrative Patent Judges. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:14 pm by admin
State licensure boards and, especially, market participant members, should begin reviewing their practices to ensure they can withstand antitrust review if necessary. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:35 am
Kaufman noted in his report that he had not reviewed all of Pisano's medical records because Pisano "failed to provide the Medical Board with this essential material. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
The post Week in Review first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
13 May 2021, 9:03 pm by Sam Wong
The order will also establish a cybersecurity safety review board and a pilot program to establish a system that will enable all parties to quickly identify if software was developed in a secure way. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm by Darren Rosenblum
If successful, the challenge would significantly curtail the SEC’s administrative powers and the powers of private actors. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the court, "on this record, none of these [parties] show[ed] that at least one of [their] members would have standing to sue," and we need not examine the other elements of organizational standing. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the court, "on this record, none of these [parties] show[ed] that at least one of [their] members would have standing to sue," and we need not examine the other elements of organizational standing. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Of the 120 total individuals tested (115 selected employees and all five board members), 17 employees and the five volunteer board members did not complete the annual training. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Of the 120 total individuals tested (115 selected employees and all five board members), 17 employees and the five volunteer board members did not complete the annual training. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:47 pm
 As discussed here, suspension of a Board of Appeal member really compromises the independence of the Boards of Appeal. [read post]