Search for: "Alternative Positioning Solutions L L C"
Results 141 - 160
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
Reading notes for:--Edward L. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
A court first has to determine if the speech in question occupies a subordinate position in the spectrum of First Amendment values such that it is classified as low-value speech. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Debate Within Cuba 568 C. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
It is necessary to reinforce the point that prosecutorial discretion, attached to a higher duty and responsibility of public lawyering is only providing a second – best solution to the imprecise drafting of Criminal law. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
It is necessary to reinforce the point that prosecutorial discretion, attached to a higher duty and responsibility of public lawyering is only providing a second – best solution to the imprecise drafting of Criminal law. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:17 pm
L & Policy 41 (2013). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
A leave-on hair cosmetic composition, comprising the following components (A), (B) and (C): (A) malic acid or a salt thereof; (B) at least one organic solvent selected from benzylacohol or 2-benzyloxyethanol; and (C) a set polymer, selected from polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer compounds, acidic vinyl ether polymer compounds, acidic polyvinyl acetate polymer compounds, acidic acrylic polymer compounds, amphoteric acrylic polymer compounds, basic acrylic polymer compounds and… [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
AUTHOR: Davis C. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
One federal court has characterized the government’s position in FOIA litigation as “Alice in Wonderland,”[6] while another, this past Friday, referred to it as “neither logical nor plausible. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
In substance, D2 discloses the examples A, B and C. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:49 pm
[L]et’s be clear what claim 2 is about. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:55 pm
Brown and Arthur L. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
" Sheldon L. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
What is new is the careful drafting Lasater brings to the proposed solution. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:00 am
The position is intuitive and straightforward. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Misappropriation is almost explicit—L’Oreal in the ECJ compares to INS v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:31 am
Thomas C. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
Call it the “First-Period Solution” to the Last-Period Problem; this non-legal force is present in stock-for-stock deals and absent in cash mergers, and the First-Period Solution might obviate the need for Revlon scrutiny in stock-for-stock mergers.[13] Of course, the degree to which the proposed First Period Solution protects target stockholders is unkn [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:57 pm
By David C. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
§ 273(c) states that commercial use includes FDA reviews of drug applications, as well as non-commercial use in “nonprofit” or university laboratory “for which the public is the intended beneficiary. [read post]
