Search for: "Argus v County of Nassau" Results 141 - 160 of 403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
After reviewing the applications, Nassau County concluded that the properties were not tax exempt under RPTL 462. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" The Appellate Division disagreed and citing Balcerak v County of Nassau, 94 NY2d 253, explained that the Board's determination did not collaterally estop Barber from denying Jackson's application for General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits.The Appellate Division also commented that substantial evidence supports the determination denying [Jackson] benefits noting that §207-c entitled correction officers to benefits when they are injured "in… [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
For divorce proceedings consult our Nassau County Divorce Lawyers. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 am
 In this 2004-commenced action, defendant State Wide Insurance Company moved on the eve of trial in late 2014 to dismiss this action based on the doctrine of collateral estoppel, arguing that the Nassau County Supreme Court order and judgment in the State Farm DJ action precluded plaintiff from arguing that it was entitled to receive no-fault benefits. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Prior to trial, in an order dated August 26, 2004, the Supreme Court determined that the County was collaterally estopped from arguing that the road was not negligently designed based upon prior decisions of this Court in Furino v County of Nassau and Zawacki v County of Nassau. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since a party may not "argue on appeal a theory never presented to the court of original jurisdiction", this issue is not preserved for review. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
Background Before discussing the remedy, let me give you some necessary background to Justice Bucaria’s unreported decision last month in Carrillos v Gomez, Short Form Order, Index No. 023142/10 [Sup Ct Nassau County Aug. 28, 2015]. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
Compare this to more Republican Nassau County, where ninety-one percent of the residents are citizens. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:52 pm
Nassau County Probate Lawyers said that the court will therefore first consider these two questions: 1. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said that on July 1, 2005, after spending several hours in a bar in Manhattan, at which he consumed at least six beers, the defendant attended a friend's party in Merrick in Nassau County. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 pm
Nassau County Probate Lawyers said that on December 4, 2007, plaintiff issued a satisfaction of its $340,000.00 mortgage, apparently in error. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Nassau County Family Lawyer said the attorney for the petitioner acknowledges that in the Matter of O'Shea v Board of Assessors of Nassau County; in the Matter of Minkoff v County of Nassau; in the Matter of Briffel v County of Nassau, 8 NY3d 249 (O'Shea), the court rejected petitioners' interpretation of the term "assessment," stating that "it makes little sense to read… [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The couple were in the midst of a divorce, and the wife filed a petition in the Nassau County Family Court, under docket number 8265/05, dated July 29, 2005. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
The Court’s Decision The decision by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Vito M. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
The clearest statement in any case I know about is found in PFT Technology LLC v Wieser, Short Form Order, Index No. 8679/12 [Sup Ct Nassau County May 21, 2014]. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
One of the them, Vella v JP&F Realty Holding, LLC, Short Form Order, Index No. 5545/12 (Sup Ct Nassau County Sept. 28, 2012), which I previously highlighted here, involved an LLC whose operating agreement contained a narrow purpose clause expressly for the acquisition of a specific parcel of realty to house the members’ separate business. [read post]