Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v." Results 141 - 160 of 551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2009, 3:17 pm
BANKRUPTCY LAW, CIVIL PROCEDURE, INJURY AND TORT LAW, PRODUCT LIABILITY Travelers Indemn. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:50 am
In late 2010, the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit, shed some light on how the sale of a company may impact claims made by employees against the successor company in Pichon v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
This theory of liability, not utilized in asbestos litigation, is currently being asserted in COVID claims. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
The jury found that Chevron Phillips and Union Carbide were liable to Brown in this product liability case, for defectively designing their product and failure to provide an adequate warning. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Clients ask whether there are remedies for the promotion of false, fraudulent, or just inadequate medical science under the banner of seeking compensation in products liability cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:17 pm by Chris Bruni
The plaintiff in the case never encountered the original asbestos containing products in the valve, he claimed that he was exposed to the "replacement" gaskets and packing used in the valve, which also contained asbestos. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
A couple of weeks ago – yeah, that’s right, on February 29 – the Supreme Court issued a ruling preempting asbestos product liability claims in Kurns v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:19 am by Sean Wajert
Relying on the component parts doctrine recognized by the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability § 5 (1997), adopted by the 3d DCA in Kohler Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 9:55 pm by Lead Counsel
Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc. (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 564 decision, it appeared manufacturers were immune from liability from asbestos containing component parts made by other entities but used in their products. [read post]