Search for: "Ash v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2018, 7:54 am by Lissa Griffin
He argued that the collateral-estoppel component of the double-jeopardy clause, as defined in the seminal case of Ashe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am by Sarah Grant, Jack Goldsmith
Legal Basis The WPR letter’s stated legal authorities for the armed conflict against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, associated forces, and, since August 2014, the Islamic State (ISIS), are the 2001 and 2002 authorizations for the use of military force (AUMF), the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power, and his “constitutional and statutory authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by John Gregory
All Australian states now have a dispensing power by statute. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Chief Justice Strine dissented, excoriating Duke for its "business strategy … to run the company in a manner that purposely skirted, and in many ways consciously violated, important environmental laws" (City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
” [Posner, chief judge, in People Who Care v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am by Eric Segall
Eric Segall is the Kathy and Lawrence Ashe Professor of Law at Georgia State University College of Law. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by John Mikhail
Trump cannot withstand scrutiny.In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm by Randy Barnett
But, with the Trinity Lutheran Church decision on June 26, originalism as a theory can confidently be relegated to the historical ash heap. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Following the court’s dismissal of the derivative action challenging the same 2011 lease, not surprisingly the siblings moved to dismiss the petition, which Justice Ash granted by Decision and Order dated March 22, 2017, stating that “[t]his Court . . . has already determined, after a trial, that the Respondents have acted properly with regards to the subject lease with Jersey Lynne. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:17 am by Peter Mahler
Following the court’s dismissal of the derivative action challenging the same 2011 lease, not surprisingly the siblings moved to dismiss the petition, which Justice Ash granted by Decision and Order dated March 22, 2017, stating that “[t]his Court . . . has already determined, after a trial, that the Respondents have acted properly with regards to the subject lease with Jersey Lynne. [read post]