Search for: "Austin v. Succession of Austin" Results 141 - 160 of 424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Tygart | Austin Federal Court Dismisses Lance Armstrong Lawsuit Against USADA, Disputing, August 20, 2012 Armstrong v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 4:09 am by Victoria VanBuren
Tygart | Austin Federal Court Dismisses Lance Armstrong Lawsuit Against USADA, Disputing, August 20, 2012 Armstrong v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:08 am by CMS
The Court of Appeal considered the usual loss of a chance principles in such cases, requiring: the claimant to prove the claim had more than a negligible prospect of success; the defendant solicitors to show that the litigation had no value; and the court to evaluate the prospects of success (Mount v Barker Austin [1988] PNLR 493). [read post]
21 May 2021, 12:52 pm by brooks
I’ve spoken to groups in El Paso, Houston, Dallas, Lubbock and Austin, among others. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:29 am by Rick Hasen
As to successful § 2 suits South Carolina and Texas are “worse” than Indiana, but all three are below the top ten offenders, which include five uncovered states (Figure V). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm by MBettman
R.C.2923.02 (A)(3)(Attempt statute)( No person…shall engage in conduct that, if successful, would constitute or result in the offense.) [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by Tim Springer
A claimant’s impairment is “severe” if it meets the standard of Stone v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The vote was a rare setback for LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender) activists who had enjoyed recent success in both the legal and public opinion arenas, culminating in the June 28, 2015 Supreme Court opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
As you recall, in December, a federal district court enjoined most of HB 20, Texas’ so-called “social media censorship” law. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
The Supreme Court held both cases pending the resolution of City of Austin, Texas v. [read post]