Search for: "BORDEN v. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
McKenna: we can’t really mean that a state of uncertainty is actionable—if we did, “I don’t know whether X makes this” would be actionable/part of the “confused” group. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
See Hall v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
The gage and emblem of this freedom is the sovereign state. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
Three lemons: bad newsfor passing-off plaintiffsThe question to be decided at appeal was whether this reputation among a significant section of the public in the UK, in the absence of goodwill, was enough to form the basis of a successful passing off action where the remaining requirements of misrepresentation and damage in the classic Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491 ‘Jif Lemon’ trinity of criteria were satisfied. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
Borden Chemical Co., New Jersey Superior Court, Law Div. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
Klein, PRIORITY OF STATE LAW POSSESSORY LIENS OVER PERFECTED SECURITY INTERESTS: IN RE BORDEN, 26-OCT Am. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:10 am
Defendant/Owen filed for a motion to dismiss, claiming that under Borden v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:46 am
In Coward v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Canal Co. v. [read post]
