Search for: "Back v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 45,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
This appears to be a known sort of deindexing trick, which I discussed at pp. 300-01 of my Shenanigans (Internet Takedown Edition) piece, and which has been known as far back as 2016, see this Tim Cushing (TechDirt) piece, and likely even earlier. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am by husovec
The case would have been almost perfect for the EC to seek the first interim measures, so TikTok was probably very wise to back down quickly. [read post]
2 May 2024, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday the Arizona legislature gave final passage to HB2677 (full text) which repeals Arizona's 160-year-old near-total abortion ban that, according to the state Supreme Court, came back into effect when Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:05 pm
The Court reviewed HK legislative history and 1950s HK case law and held that the HK colonial legislature decided ‘consciously’ back in 1938 against including an intention to incite violence as a necessary ingredient of the statutory ‘seditious intention’ offences [paras 81, 82]. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm by JURIST Staff
The vote follows a ruling by Arizona’s Supreme Court that the 159-year-old law banning abortion was enforceable in the aftermath of the US Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn abortion rights case Roe v Wade, sending a 52-year-old case back to trial court. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:00 am by Donnelly L. McDowell
Despite its length, the Guidance conspicuously omits any reference to last fall’s landmark decision in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]