Search for: "Beecham v. Beecham" Results 141 - 160 of 434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
26 Jun 2012, 3:52 pm by The Federalist Society
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
Federalist Society SCOTUScast - http://fedsoc.server326.com/audio/SCOTUScast/SCOTUScast.xml
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against OT Pay for Pharmaceutical Salespeople
25 Jun 2012, 7:08 am by Mitchell Boyarsky
The Court’s holding in Christopher v. [read post]
Employment Law Alert - http://www.employmentlawalert.com
?Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham: SCOTUS Holds that Pharma Reps Are Exempt Salespeople Under FLSA
22 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Smithkline Beecham Corp. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
U.S. Supreme Court: Pharmaceutical Sales Reps are FLSA Exempt
21 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
The case is Christopher v. [read post]
What's New in Employment Law? - http://shawvalenza.blogspot.com/
Putting On Work Clothes And Walking From Locker Room Not Compensable For Overtime Pay
21 Jun 2012, 10:47 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp.? [read post]
San Francisco Employment Lawyer Blog - http://www.sanfranciscoemploymentlawyer-blog.com/
Pharma Sales Reps Not Entitled to Overtime
21 Jun 2012, 8:51 am by Frank Steinberg
Christopher v. [read post]
New Jersey Employment Law Blog - http://employment.lawfirmnewjersey.com/
One Small Step For Employers, One Giant Leap For The Pharmaceutical Industry
21 Jun 2012, 8:43 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
Hunton Employment & Labor Law Perspectives - http://www.huntonlaborblog.com/
Close Counts in Horseshoes, Hand Grenades and Sales: Supreme Court Holds Pharmaceutical Representatives Exempt Under FLSA
21 Jun 2012, 6:33 am by John T. McDonald
 Thus, such employees are not entitled to overtime protection.In Christopher v. [read post]
Employment Law Watch - http://www.employmentlawwatch.com/
The Supreme Court Issues Its First Exemption Decision
21 Jun 2012, 5:47 am by My name
SILVERMAN ON JUNE 21, 2012 In Christopher, et al. v. [read post]
HR Defense Blog - http://www.akerman.com/Blogs/hrdefense/
Supreme Court finds pharmaceutical sales reps exempt under the outside sales exemption
20 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm by Leigh Anne Benedic
Smith Kline Beecham Corp. [read post]
Employer Law Report - http://www.employerlawreport.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Decides Wage & Hour Case: Pharmaceutical Sales Personnel Not Entitled to Overtime Pay
19 Jun 2012, 10:04 pm by Kevin LaCroix
SmithKline Beecham can be found here. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
Supreme Court Declares Pharmaceutical Sales Reps Exempt From Overtime
19 Jun 2012, 1:16 pm by Todd Hanchett
In Christopher v. [read post]
World of Work - http://www.stoelrivesworldofemployment.com/
With Many Workers Underemployed, Overtime Pay Takes Spotlight
19 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm
With the Supreme Court decision yesterday in Christopher v. [read post]
New York Employment Lawyer Blog - http://www.newyorkemploymentlawyerblog.com/
Special Report: A quick and dirty on this week's "drug rep" overtime decision . . . and why all employers should be pleased
19 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm by Robin E. Shea
Here is a brief breakdown of this week's 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Christopher v. [read post]
Employment & Labor Insider - http://www.employmentandlaborinsider.com/
Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham
19 Jun 2012, 9:53 am by Liz Overton
Yesterday the U.S. [read post]
Iowa Law Blog - http://www.iowa-lawblog.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Sides With Employers on the Outside Sales Exemption
19 Jun 2012, 7:52 am by Thomas Kaufman
Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision Christopher v. [read post]
Labor Employment Law Blog - http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/
Christopher v. Smith Kline Beecham Corp. (June 18, 2012)
19 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by SupremeCourtHaiku
Pharma “detailers” Considered “outside salesmen” No overtime due Opinion:  pdf  html [read post]
Supreme Court Haiku - http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/
SCOTUS: Pharmaceutical Reps Exempt from FLSA
19 Jun 2012, 2:43 am by laborprof lpb
The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Christopher v. [read post]
Workplace Prof Blog - http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/
Christopher et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp., dba Glaxosmithkline holds, 5-4, that pharma sales reps are exempt as "outside salespersons"
18 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm by The Complex Litigator
See, e.g., Sturm v. [read post]
the complex litigator - http://www.thecomplexlitigator.com/post-data/
Best in Law Blogs : The LexBlog Network : June 18, 2012
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We have two topics dominating today’s conversation on LXBN: the Supreme Court ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
Real Lawyers :: Have Blogs - http://kevin.lexblog.com/