Search for: "Bender v. Bender" Results 141 - 160 of 445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Bender v New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 38 NY2d 662, the Appellate Division explained that the Doctrine of Estoppel "is only applicable to a government agency when the agency acts or comports itself wrongfully or negligently, inducing reliance by a party who changes his or her position to his or her detriment or prejudice. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Bender v New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 38 NY2d 662, the Appellate Division explained that the Doctrine of Estoppel "is only applicable to a government agency when the agency acts or comports itself wrongfully or negligently, inducing reliance by a party who changes his or her position to his or her detriment or prejudice. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Legal Forms (Matthew Bender), §§ 45.231[1], 92.80[2][m], 92.80[2][v].6 Fed Procedural Forms L. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
Bender, reporting from Des Moines, in "How College-Educated Republicans Learned to Love Trump Again/Blue-collar white voters make up Donald Trump’s base. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:59 am by Lyle Denniston
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint, finding that these allegations, even if proven, would not entitle the plaintiff to relief pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Sammy v Haupel, 170 AD3d at 1225-1226; Seldon v Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 116 AD3d 490, 491 [2014]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows &… [read post]