Search for: "Betts v. Betts" Results 141 - 160 of 249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 11:54 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Hugo Black’s unanimous opinion invalidated Betts v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:24 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Javier Vázquez, socio capital de O’Neill & Borges; Repte. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:57 am
CopyrightOlivia de Havilland, the actress most remembered for her interpretations in movies such as Gone with the Wind and To Each His Own, did not particularly appreciate her portrayal in in a TV miniseries called Feud: Bette and Joan. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Rule of LawCourt of Appeal Varies Trial Decision in Chinn v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am by Chris Castle
 849 F.2d 460 (9th Cir. 1989) (misappropriation of Bette Midler’s voice) and Waits v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:48 am
We have previously compared the fierce competition between Supreme Court correspondents Linda Greenhouse, of the New York Times, and Jan Crawford Greenbrug, of the Chicago Tribune, to the rivalry between Margo Channing (Bette Davis) and Eve Harrington (Anne Baxter) in All About Eve. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:28 pm by Michael Millemann
If you litigate, however, base the arguments on state declaration of rights provisions and procedural due process provisions (state and federal), the latter converting Civil Gideon into Civil Betts, as in Betts v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:54 pm by Melanie Perez
” Unfortunately, judges have been reluctant to create bright-line boundaries which has encouraged celebrities to file all sorts of claims like for an imitated golf swing or even a “sound a-like,” as in the Bette Midler v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:09 am by Jake Linford
See, for example, EMI Catalogue Partnership v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 7:46 am by Scott Hervey
Feud told the tale of the infamous silver screen ongoing battle between Bette Davis and Joan Crawford. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:36 am by Josh Blackman
And the Court "requested both sides to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments the following: 'Should this Court's holding in Betts v. [read post]