Search for: "Blum v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by admin
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by Schachtman
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:06 am by Larry Ribstein
Blum, 2010 WL 629850 at *10, n. 70 (Del.Ch., February 24, 2010), and Bay Center Apartments Owner, LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
For The Progressive, Bill Blum takes note of the ways in which the Roberts court “has been hard on labor unions and the rights of working people,” culminating in last term’s decisions in Epic Systems v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at a new First Amendment challenge to Michigan’s plan to establish an independent redistricting commission; Mazie notes that the Supreme Court cited the Michigan effort approvingly in Rucho v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 4:26 pm by Chip Merlin
Matthew Pearson discussed his involvement as amicus counsel for a number of commercial interests in Blum's Furniture Co., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
A divided panel of the Eleventh Circuit found that an action for discrimination based on sexual orientation cannot be brought under Title VII, claiming that it needed to follow the precedent set by Blum v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
And Niina Farah of E&E News considers the implications for oil and gas development in the state. [read post]