Search for: "Bostock v. Clayton County" Results 141 - 160 of 518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Clayton County held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids employment discrimination based on LGBT status? [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by Howard Friedman
Clayton County, Georgia, (Docket No. 17-1618) (SCOTUSblog Case Page) and consolidated it with Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:14 am by Amy Howe
Clayton County, and between Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito and advocate David Cole in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:04 am by Howard Friedman
Clayton County, Georgia (case page on SCOTUSblog) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:30 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
Clayton County, Georgia no afecta los derechos establecidos en el aprobado Código Civil. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Deborah L. Brake
Clayton County is more than a decent substitute. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Joshua R. Goodbaum
Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:03 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Clayton County that if an employer fires women who date women, but not men who date women, it violates Title VII of the Act, which prohibits sex discrimination in employment. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:30 am by Allison Brownell Tirres
Allison Brownell Tirres Advocates of equality breathed a sigh of relief when the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bostock v. [read post]