Search for: "Boston Technologies, Inc." Results 141 - 160 of 687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by Amber Walsh
Based in Boston, the firm seeks to invest $15 million to $75 million in healthcare and technology companies with growth greater than 20% and scale greater than $10 million in revenue. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:35 am
This post is based on the recent joint shareholder letter from JANA Partners LLC and CalSTRS to the Board of Apple, Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Morton David Goldberg, Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, New York, New York, for amici Alliance Entertainment Corp., Audible Inc., Blue Spike, Inc., The Clandestine Group, Inc., Digimarc Corporation, Digital Media on Demand, Inc., FullAudio Corporation, InterTrust Technologies Corporation, Oak Technology, Inc., Reciprocal, Inc., RioPort, Inc., RPK SecureMedia Inc., Verance Corporation, and VNU USA, Inc. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:17 am
Scheuermann, K&L Gates LLP, on Tuesday, November 28, 2017 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Cybersecurity, Due diligence, Mergers & acquisitions, Privacy, R&W insurance, Risk assessment, Risk management Founder Replacement and Startup Performance Posted by Michael Ewens (California Institute of Technology), and Matt Marx (Boston University), on Tuesday, November 28, 2017 Tags: Agency costs, Boards of… [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:14 am by Rachel Sandler
Ct. 1514, 1521 (2017) [2] In Re Micron Technology Inc, U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 1:41 pm by John Floyd
Digital Receiver Technology, Inc. manufactures a security surveillance device called DRT 1301C. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:09 am
Fang, University of Minnesota; and Allen Huang, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, on Wednesday, October 4, 2017 Tags: Agency costs, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Executive performance, Incentives, Long-Term value, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Repurchases, Shareholder value, Short-termism CEO and Executive Compensation Practices: 2017 Edition Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference… [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 6:06 am
Haas and Charles Brewer, Hunton & Williams LLP, on Tuesday, August 8, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Conflicts of interest, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Duty of candor, Institutional Investors, institutional Shareholder Services Inc. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Washington Post, Brian Fung breaks down the court’s decision this week in Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark International, Inc., in which the justices ruled that U.S. and overseas sales of a product extinguish the patentholder’s rights to sue for infringement; he points out that the “case has huge implications for the way we think about technology ownership in America, and your rights as a user. [read post]
24 May 2017, 9:00 pm by Erik J. Heels
Top 10 Boston Patent Firms * Blueshift IP, LLC Specializing in computer technology and software patents in an era when software patents are under attack. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:46 am by Jon Brodkin
Stephenson discussed his thoughts yesterday at the annual JP Morgan Technology, Media, and Telecom conference in Boston. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law Symposium Sorry, guys, I did not follow the patent panels.Panel III: Trademarks Rebecca Tushnet, Fixing Incontestability: The Next FrontierIncontestability is a nearly unique feature of American trademark law, with a unique American implementation. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 8:15 am by Michael B. Stack
How Technology Is Changing Workers’ Compensation New technologies are improving workers’ compensation programs in everything from communications and training to health care delivery and claims, according to experts. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:06 am by John Jascob
Still, commenters appeared united on tackling the issue of compliance costs.Gregory Kleffner, executive vice president and CFO of Stein Mart, Inc., an apparel retailer with stores across the county, said the conflict minerals rule is a diversion from the SEC’s core mission, the consideration that should be the primary driver of the agency’s review. [read post]