Search for: "Branch v. State Bar"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2017, 1:51 pm
Gates and Jawad v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:45 pm
Garden State Bar Ass'n, 457 U.S. 423, 432 (1982). [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:10 am
In Borman v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am
Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506 [1990]; see Schrull v Weis, 166 AD3d at 831). [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:05 am
Claiming exempt volunteer firefighter status for the purposes of Civil Service Law §75.1(b)Serviss v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 2018 NY Slip Op 05597, Appellate Division, Second Department§75.1 of the Civil Service Laws generally bars the termination of a tenured officer or employee in the Competitive Class of Classified Service of the State or a political subdivision of the State "except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:04 pm
Wi-Fi One, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:22 pm
As this Court held in Al-Zahrani v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
At 10 a.m. next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a case that implicates the constitutional authority of all three branches of the government: Zivotofsky, et al., v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Roosevelt to bar entry of persons “prejudicial to the interests of the United States” delegated only narrow power to exclude saboteurs and hostile foreign agents. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:15 am
In Lucia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
EVEN IF ALLEGED SEXUAL ABUSE OCCURRED OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK STATEWhen SW filed a suit against The United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism (USCJ) and others alleging entitlement to damages under the state’s Child Victims Act (CVA), the defendants countered that the claim was barred because the purported sexual abuse occurred in Yellowstone National Park – during a “cross-country bus trip” sponsored by a “branch” entity associated with the… [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 7:39 am
On one level, United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
(09-1298) and Boeing Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:24 am
Patel v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:02 pm
ACLU Foundation v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:38 am
FEC (2010); Paul Clement in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
We conclude that the States have made a sufficient showing to support standing, at least at this preliminary stage of the proceedings.(...)The States argue that the Executive Order causes a concrete and particularized injury to their public universities, which the parties do not dispute are branches of the States under state law. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
” It notes that we stated in McPherson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
