Search for: "Byrd v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm
United States, 325 U. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:02 am
If you check out Rules 913 and 920 in the Manual for Courts-Martial United States (2012), you will see that the judge gives preliminary instructions to the panel before the court martial actually begins, and then provides “instructions on findings” before the members deliberate on a verdict. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
United States), and religion (Bishop Fred Pickerling, Danny Noonan). [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
United States), and religion (Bishop Fred Pickerling, Danny Noonan). [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 8:29 am
An example is Haywood v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:55 pm
She was appointed by the Court to make those arguments in the case of United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
Plumer instead voted for his friend, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams for President and United States Ambassador to Britain, William Rush as Vice-President, even though neither Adams nor Rush were candidates for those offices. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:40 am
The recall effort against Cook, Byrd and Ortega was anchored in Brown’s church. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
Byrd, 470 U.S. 213 (1985) (state law claims). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
Byrd, 470 U.S. 213 (1985) (state law claims). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
This is part of a growing generation of cases involving governments in Canada and the United States prosecuting individuals for the contents of the comics that they’re reading. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:45 am
United States, not Pettus v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:33 pm
Byrd, 470 U. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 8:18 am
Because my adversary, Sandy Byrd, insisted on pressing negligence and punitive damages, I was able to try an empty-chair defense against the United States government, which owned and ran the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, where plaintiff worked. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
Byrd: The Court overruled its recent decision in State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am
§ 7, the United States has recently taken the position that classifications based on sexual orientation should be subjected to heightened scrutiny. [read post]
