Search for: "C. B. Restaurants, Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2014, 2:53 am
Shaw, Inc., Serial No. 85797528 [Refusal to register the three-dimensional configuration of external helical fluting (shown below) for "rifle barrels; rifles," on the grounds of functionality under Section 2(e)(5) and failure to comply with the examining attorney's requirement for information under Rule 2.61(b)]. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:40 am
Indeed, the latter are mandatory under Section 35(b) of the Lanham Act if the use of the counterfeit mark has been willful. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 2:24 pm
Restaurant v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 5:21 pm
” See Immigration and Nationality Act § 214(c)(2)(B). [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
TM is concerned with one kind of generalization: source information—who is responsible b/c of the presence of mark. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Splitting those apart is the point of the paper.Poor theory of distinctiveness + incredibly strong rights = trademark proliferation, land grab for expressive components of society b/c it’s in their interests to do so. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:59 am
Borax, Inc., 138 Cal. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
., Inc.Court: U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 13-1685 Judge: Selya At issue in this case was a popular restaurant in Puerto Rico owned by Lorraine Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An intellectual property attorney for J & J Sports Production, Inc. of Campbell, California ("J & J Sports") sued Minerva Soriano and Soriano's Mexican Restaurant, LLC, both d/b/a Soriano's Mexican Restaurant of Indianapolis, Indiana, in the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:54 am
The law is set out in California Evidence Code §646 as follows: “(b) The judicial doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is a presumption affecting the burden of producing evidence. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 12:14 pm
It alleges that Juan C. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:58 am
Stakeholders were also of the view that it would be more efficient to combine what are now two separate direct and rebuttal phases of ratesetting hearings, as contemplated by 17 U.S.C. 803(b)(6)(C), into a single integrated trial - again as is more typical of civil litigation. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
(2) Is the adoption of an ordinance enacting a voter-sponsored initiative under Elections Code section 9214, subdivision (a), a “ministerial project” exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080, subdivision (b)(1)? [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Harry Sherman Crowe Housing Co-operative Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
§ 553(c)(3)(B); (c) the recovery of full costs pursuant to Title 47 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:28 am
§ 553(c)(3)(B); (c) the recovery of full costs pursuant to Title 47 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Intitulé :Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. c. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:58 am
Demarest agreed with Dorine (a) that the release does not cover transactions unrelated to Jersey Lynne Farms, (b) that the Caterina Realty operating agreement’s majority-rule provision does not insulate defendants from Dorine’s claims based on breach of fiduciary duty, and (c) that Caterina Realty may not advance legal defense costs of the individual defendants. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
Bearing this in mind, Joshy notes, today -- buried deep within the Deregulation Bill 2014 -- is the following provision (effective two months from the Act’s commencement date)Blocking: if only it wereas easy as A, B, C ... [read post]
