Search for: "CJ v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
As already mentioned, on the same day Lord Thomas CJ and Nicola Davies J gave judgment on remedy in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast Publications Ltd. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:48 am
Felts, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
United States, 132 S. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am
It stems from a Supreme Court decision from 1989, DeShaney v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:34 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law Despite the United States Supreme Court's holding last Term in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 1:42 am
Ferras; United States of America v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 5:40 am
The only difference is I tried to answer CJ Robert’s question. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:19 pm
"--Chief Justice Roberts to Howard Srebnick when the CJ was asking how a district court is to determine how much money should be used for a fee.I was able to travel to D.C. to sit in the Supreme Court and watch Howard make his argument in Luis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
The principle was described as follows by Lamer CJ in R v Jones, 1994 CanLII 85 (SCC), [1994] 2 SCR 229 at p 249: Any state action that coerces an individual to furnish evidence against him or herself in a proceeding in which the individual and the state are adversaries violates the principle against self-incrimination. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
Granted, as Fenney J observed in Collins, “the tort of negligence … requires proof of damage” ([4.4]); but, as Finlay CJ made clear in Conway, such damage can and does include distress. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
In Bright Lord Judge CJ cited from Lord Camden CJ’s judgment in Entick v Carrington and from William Pitt, Earl of Chatham. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 4:07 am
It’s the same mistake of law, that all brake lights had to work rather than just the one the law requires, that the Supreme Court decided was an “objectively reasonable” screw up in Heien v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Phillips v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
’ ” When the CJ makes a funny, everyone does the obligatory chuckle. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:27 pm
The first instance CJ stated he followed Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan [1940] AC 880 and Lord Wright: The liability for a nuisance is not, at least in modern law, a strict or absolute liability…he is not liable unless he continued or adopted the nuisance, or, more accurately, did not without undue delay remedy it when he became aware of it, or with ordinary and reasonable care should have become aware of it. [read post]
