Search for: "CLOSE v. COATES"
Results 141 - 160
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:15 am
Management Corp. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
” The Committee’s Questions Hostility Toward the CDR Program The proposed reauthorization of NSA’s CDR program faced close scrutiny from the committee. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:53 am
See Gordon v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
In Basic Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:13 pm
(The People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
LTC argued that the defendants intended to deceive the public as to the origin of the new Metrocab by adopting a shape which closely resembled LTC taxis and that, by marketing the Metrocab, they would commit trademark infringement and passing off. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:28 pm
” The above phrase recently received its first detailed judicial consideration in Delnorth Pty Ltd v Dura-Post (Aust) Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1225. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
V. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
(citing Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
OnFriday the Supreme Court decided four cases, including a closely watched Fourth Amendment case, Carpenter v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
The underpinning of Daubert is that an expert’s opinion could be unreliable and the jury could not figure that out, even given cross-examination and argument, because the jurors are deferent to a qualified expert (i.e., the white lab coat effect). [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:10 am
Ronald Hicks v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:00 am
State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:00 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:55 am
Rider with coat-tails ... [read post]
