Search for: "Cain v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2023, 3:47 pm by Brian Lindsey
Ruling on a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, Judge Cain of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana agreed that there was no coverage under the Cyber Liability policy provisions as to third-party and first-party coverage. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-29Issue: (1) Whether, in a prosecution for insider trading under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am by Maureen Johnston
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner's penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner's claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Cain, No. 07-30709 In a collateral proceeding in a murder case, grant of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) petitioner adequately exhausted his claims in state court; 2) the admission of hearsay testimony at his trial was erroneous; and 3) the state court's holding that the error was harmless was contrary to, and an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, involving a prosecution under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, or the ’34 Act, as we old-timers call it (rescheduled for this Friday’s Conference); and Crews v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:32 am by Jeff Gamso
  See, especially, Justice Sutherland in Berger v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 22-800Issue: Whether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
” Emphasizing the dispute over state-federal relations in Arizona v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"we're ashamed that the president of the United States is from Texas." [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]