Search for: "Calvert v. Calvert" Results 141 - 160 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm by Amanda Traphagan
Calvert, which applied the sale-for-resale exemption a similar government contract situation nearly 40 years ago. [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:41 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Medical Malpractice Opinions Body: AC34447 - Calvert v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause… [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 3:58 am by Lorene Park
As for sexual harassment, which continues to be prevalent, a Texas employee sued her supervisor (and the employer) after the supervisor sexually harassed her by making offensive comments, touching her, exposing himself both at work and in pictures he put on her cell phone, and threatening to fire her if she failed to perform sexual acts (Calvert v Brachfeld Law Group, PC, d/b/a Law Offices of Brachfeld & Associates, March 36, 2013, No. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:21 pm by Margaret Peachy
Philip Elman graduated Harvard Law School in 1939 and immediately began his legal career as a clerk for Judge Calvert Magruder in the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:11 pm by WIMS
Goodrich Corporation (Goodrich) and, among others, were liable for environmental cleanup at the Goodrich plant in Calvert City, Kentucky. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:56 am by Steven Berk
”  Apparently a draft audit from last year garnered criticism from Maryland Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:31 am by Richard A. Epstein
On January 11, 2012, a unanimous Supreme Court issued its decision in Pacific Operators OffShore v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:25 am
This would appear to have violated the Fourth Amendment under the rule announced in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]