Search for: "Carnegie v. Carnegie" Results 141 - 160 of 286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 3:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
July 22, 2013); Ariad, 598 F.3d at 1350; Carnegie Mellon Univ. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:03 am
Carnegie Mellon University ("CMU") filed a patent infringement action Marvell Technology Group and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:43 pm by Lowell Brown
In Cameron Moon v. the State of Texas, the appeals court vacated the district court’s judgment and dismissed the case after finding insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s findings related to Moon’s maturity, sophistication, and potential rehabilitation. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
  Read the verdict in Carnegie Mellon University v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
It is understood that Marvell, who was sued by Carnegie Mellon in 2009, will be filing post-trial motions before Judge Fischer in order to reverse the jury award. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 4:06 am
In the patent infringement action brought by Carnegie Mellon University ("Carnegie Mellon" or "CMU") against Marvell Technology Group, LTD. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Marvell's stock price plunged about 10% following news that a jury had awarded well over $1 billion patent infringement verdict to Carnegie Mellon University. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
The Apple-Samsung award needs to be adjusted here and there, but the CMU-Marvell award must simply be tossed or slashed in order to protect the innovation economy against patent unreasonableness.The cross-appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]