Search for: "Center for Regulatory Reasonableness v. EPA"
Results 141 - 160
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm
” As the SG explained, the reason for the acquiescence is practical. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:42 am
EPA, along with others from the term such as Carson v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:29 am
Kagan’s approach builds on prior caselaw, including United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 7:55 pm
EPA, 573 U. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
It has also become a focus of shareholder actions within enterprises, and regulatory programs in the US federal government. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 7:29 pm
[internal citations omitted] Chevron, U.S.A. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:36 am
Supreme Court in Whitman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
In 1997 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) set a goal of less than 2.1 cases/100,000 by 2010. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am
EPA, a more modest and bipartisan proposal might have been far more prudent. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Revesz & Max Sarinsky, Regulatory Antecedents and the Major Questions Doctrine (Dec. 12, 2022). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am
Charlie Cray is a research specialist with Greenpeace USA and the director of the Center for Corporate Policy in Washington, DC. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
Samet himself has been at the center of other conflict-of-interest controversies. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Despite the Center’s best efforts, many federal judges have shown themselves to be incorrigible. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:40 pm
EPA. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Several leading companies including IKEA Supply, Microsoft, and Salesforce support the reform, and a number of smaller firms do as well.[5] For the reasons discussed below, more firms – and their legal and other advisers– should follow them. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
Examples of non-discretionary duties that courts will enforce include the Federal Records Act mandate that the National Archivist “shall request the Attorney General to initiate … an action” for redress of record destruction; a statute requiring “timber in an amount … not less than the annual sustained yield capacity … shall be sold annually”; or a regulatory “duty to warn. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Second, we present evidence on public-company disclosures consistent with issuers’ understanding that the SEC has long had authority to take regulatory action in this area. [read post]
