Search for: "Chevron U.S.A. Holdings Inc." Results 141 - 160 of 177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
Both cases address whether the regulations at issue warrant deference under Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
 The court frames this issue of deference owed to a federal administrative agency’s regulation by applying the Chevron standard.[9]  Chevron provides a two-step test in determining whether a federal agency’s statutory interpretation is granted a broad amount of deference. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
 The court frames this issue of deference owed to a federal administrative agency’s regulation by applying the Chevron standard.[9]  Chevron provides a two-step test in determining whether a federal agency’s statutory interpretation is granted a broad amount of deference. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
  Chevron[2] deference is still nominally the law as of this writing,[3] but litigants are acting as if the decision that gave that doctrine its name has already been overturned. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
NMFS contends that this restriction bars only actions that will both (1) reduce appreciably the likelihood of survival and (2) reduce appreciably the likelihood of recovery, and that its views are entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:03 am
Accord id. at 505 ("absen[t]. . .a clear congressional command as to pre-emption. . ., the relevant administrative agency possesses a degree of leeway to determine. . .pre-emptive effect") (Breyer, J. concurring).Four plus one equals five.Hillsborough and Lohr invoked deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:10 am by Andrew Frisch
Walling, 324 U.S. 490, 493 (1945), and is neither erroneous nor unreasonable, see, e.g., Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:34 am
§ 479 is ambiguous doesn't necessarily refer back to the IRA, and, therefore, as a matter of pure statutory construction, applying Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]