Search for: "Clark v. James"
Results 141 - 160
of 509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
A $40,000 “penal bond” must be presented to the Clark of the Court within 20 days. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:52 am
Victoria Clark posted two rulings in the transgender servicemember ban litigation, Doe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:20 am
David v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:36 am
Clark D. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
Clark D. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:36 am
Clark D. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The United States has taken the next step in its trade dispute with Canada and asked for the establishment of a panel to examine its complaint regarding Canada’s administration of its tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) allocations for 14 dairy products.[1] In its request, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) [2] claims that Canada’s allocation of import quotas exclusively to “producers” violates the terms of Canada’s commitments in the schedule to annex 2-B[3] of the… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:07 am
Gideon v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
Clark v Werden Peter Clark, James Werden and John Muller were once business associates, but Clark and Werden had a falling out. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:52 pm
James R-1 Sch. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 8:15 am
James R-1 Sch. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
10 May 2018, 2:55 am
” [Chris Edwards, Cato on Janus v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:36 am
JAMES E. [read post]
23 Jul 2006, 7:56 pm
To avoid execution based upon a claim of mental retardation, petitioner must show significantly sub-average intellectual functioning which is accompanied by related limitations in adoptive functioning the onset of which occurs prior to age 18.JAMES LEE CLARK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
In a Legal Backgrounder for the Washington Legal Foundation, James Beck and Michelle Cheng look at the impact of the Court’s recent decision in Daimler AG v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:21 pm
Dan Tarlock: Shodde v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
Supreme Court in a 1984 decision, Clark v. [read post]
