Search for: "Cochran v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 346
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2015, 7:11 am
 Further, where the letter of intent is unambiguous and constitutes an enforceable contract, it is unnecessary to have a plenary hearing on the merits of a motion to enforce a settlement agreementFacts: The appeal arose out of the execution of a letter of intent which was the result of the settlement of litigation over the contested ownership of parking spaces.Analysis:  Distinguishing Cochran v Norkunas, which held that the parties did not intend to be bound by… [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of Canada has stated that “[t]he Charter does not confer a freestanding constitutional right to health care. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:18 am by Darren Olivier
It stated that the ASA only hears matters relating to “published advertising” (in relation to the definition of ‘advertising’ in the ASA Code). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:48 am
Cochrane [1993] Crim LR 98, which was applied in Ireland in relation to mobile phone records by People (DPP) v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm by Legal Talk Network
Thomas Girardi is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame who's commonly known for his work in Anderson v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:48 am by INFORRM
The most popular posts of the summer covered a variety of themes: The Police Tip-Off and Cliff Richard – Dominic Crossley Phone Hacking, So they think it’s all over – Julian Petley The Perils of “Revenge Porn”, Part 2 – Alex Cochrane How Daily Mail Editorial Standards are still Falling Through the Floor – Tom Rowland Case Law: Cooke and Midland Heart Ltd v MGN: A seriously harmful approach to serious harm? [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By Michele Haydel Gehrke In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device (“BYOD”) policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
The trial court, alas, erred in stating the relevant statistical concepts. [read post]