Search for: "Cola v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
United States, 60 Ct. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:09 pm
Coca Cola Bottling Co., 260 F.3d 257, 261 (3d Cir. 2001) (“Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation”); Wrightson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:40 am
FTC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:40 am
FTC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:30 am
The recent non-precedential opinion of Automated Tracking Solutions v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:12 am
Red Paralela imported the beverage from the UK to Spain, which were put on the market by Coca-Cola. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:00 pm
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., 833 F.3d 530 (5th Cir. 2016). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:00 pm
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., 833 F.3d 530 (5th Cir. 2016). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:30 am
Further, even if federal law doesn’t protect certain LGBT rights at work, state or local law may. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
We also note the treatment by the Canadian Trademark Opposition Board, confirmed on Appeal (see, for example, Cheung's Bakery Products Ltd v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 5:56 am
And while the vending machine case of Magee v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:50 am
United States, the case was about immunity granted to witnesses in a criminal trial. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am
In 1999 Schweppes sold the rights to the name to the Coca-Cola Company in 13 EU Member States (including the UK), keeping their rights in 18 other countries in the EU, among which was Spain. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
In late 2013, WPR, on behalf of its client NCO, filed suits in Illinois state court seeking repayment of student debt owed by Marquez, Garriga, and Russell. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
And courts and the USPTO have occasionally applied public use doctrine to find that the widespread use of a mark by the public, like “Coke” for Coca-Cola, “Mac” for Macintosh computers, or “the Evil Empire” for the Yankees, can give rise to protectable trademark rights or at least provide adequate foundation to prevent a competitor from making use of a confusingly similar term. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 8:13 am
He and his coworkers were upset about the article, leading him to ask the HR director and others how COLA funds were used. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm
"); Power Test Petroleum Distr., Inc. v. [read post]
