Search for: "Concerned Members v. District Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 6,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
The District Court affirmed the arbitrator’s award finding the LCA was not a prohibited private agreement because a union business agent was present for and participated in the negotiations between Cash and Stroehmann concerning the LCA. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:10 am
The District Court’s Decision. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:31 am
The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling.With respect to Casamento’s allegations concerning Local 589, the Circuit Court said that “In addition to its proscription against gender discrimination by employers, Title VII renders it unlawful for "a labor organization . . . to discriminate against any individual because of . . . sex. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 4:13 am
The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling.With respect to Casamento's allegations concerning Local 589, the Circuit Court said that "In addition to its proscription against gender discrimination by employers, Title VII renders it unlawful for "a labor organization . . . to discriminate against any individual because of . . . sex. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Nov. 26, 2013), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Three) reversed an order denying class certification of wage and hour claims. [read post]
Court address claims of breach of contract, negligent termination and defamation alleged by educator
8 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Court address claims of breach of contract, negligent termination and defamation alleged by educatorWilliams v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 5:17 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a lawsuit brought by the U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
” The district court certified all three purchaser classes. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:41 am
On November 17, 2009, the Court in Cartwright v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
Superior Court (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1291; accord, Kaldenbach v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:14 am
At 9:00 a.m., the Court will hear Iskanian v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:17 am
The district court disagreed. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
By the time of Rucho v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia) Last Monday, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued two significant rulings in Doe. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:08 pm
“In construing a contract, a court’s primary concern is to ascertain the intentions of the parties as expressed in the instrument. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:08 am
On March 25, 2011, Northern District Court Judge Jeffrey S. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
Justice Rivera: In Clancy, the issues of concern to the court were the delicate balance of harms. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 5:15 pm
LEXIS 64203 (ND OH, Aug. 30, 2007), an Ohio federal district court rejected an equal protection challenge to the exclusion of religious service brought by a former member of the Air Force who later worked as a youth minister. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
Supreme Court issues its opinion in Dukes v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
In 2010 13 current or former Sergeants and Deputies commenced an action against the County and the Department [Employer] in the United States District Court* for the Western District of New York alleging that the County and the Department [herein after "Employer"] violated the Fair Labor Standards Act [[FLSA] 29 USC §201 et seq.] in compensating them for attending or conducting roll call briefings. [read post]
