Search for: "Cook v. Advertiser Company"
Results 141 - 160
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:07 am
An early example of the Great British double entendre Zoe Renault v Renault Zoe. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:33 am
Satterfield v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Reyes, Star Advertiser, July 15, 2010 About $3.5 billion in sewer construction projects planned over the next 10 years will help the city comply with a consent decree to settle years of litigation alleging deficiencies in the city’s sewage and waste-water treatment systems, officials said. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:11 am
LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 4:18 pm
Cook Cty. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
But the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as McCain-Feingold, after its two chief sponsors) forbids political advertisements paid for by corporations in the weeks before a primary. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:11 am
National Pork Board and National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:42 pm
., a Chicago-based investment bank that apparently drums up new business by cold-calling companies to offer its services. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
But the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as McCain-Feingold, after its two chief sponsors) forbids political advertisements paid for by corporations in the weeks before a primary. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
The smell of home-cooked meals. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Boyd v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
See id. at *5 n. 6, citing Cooke v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
Relying on Inwood Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 10:50 pm
[GAMES disclaimed].September 24, 2009 - 10 AM: Southern Snow Manufacturing, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:27 am
Let's reconvene here in February 2010 and see what the Utah bunch is cooking up for the 2010 legislative session. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
