Search for: "Cool v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 673
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2019, 9:26 am by Eric Goldman
He says that “Barnes, Internet Brands and the other federal cases (as well as Demetriades) relied on by plaintiffs show that plaintiffs’ argument that their UCL claim survives the defense of section 230 finds support in the text of that section, is far from frivolous, and might some day even be adopted by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:09 am by Ronald Mann
With the exception of cases against the United States, it has been two years since the last example of such one-sided support. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
  Such conduct was expected to comply with law and it was left to the state and its domestic legal order to deal with those issues. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Meanwhile, Robert Williams contextualized the arrest of Huawei’s CFO in Canada—reportedly at the request of the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
You can catch us in October at the Garden State Council SHRM Conference and Expo. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am by Benjamin Wittes
I believed in the two-state solution before it was cool. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]