Search for: "Criminal Productions, Inc. v. Doe 1 et al" Results 141 - 160 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
A greater concern than direct compliance costs is the potential for the rule to aid cyber criminals. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
For such employees, mobility is a sufficient defense against opportunistic conduct, because they can quit and be replaced without productive loss to either employee or employer. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am by Schachtman
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 664 F.Supp. 2d 137 (D. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
  The evidence showed that from 1996 through September 2000, Edwards, the founder of ETS Payphones, Inc. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
  So how does that warrant a title of “billion-dollar lawyer”? [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
” Appellants [Judith Miller et al.] argue that “this proposition of law is flatly contrary to the great weight of authority in this and other circuits. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
In addition, the SEC has organized working groups specialized in certain areas such as new and structured products, valuation, and fixed income securities. [read post]