Search for: "D. Elkin" Results 141 - 160 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2021, 6:19 am
Fortt, and Lindsay Hall, Vinson & Elkins LLP, on Thursday, April 8, 2021 Tags: Banks, Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Financial institutions, Institutional Investors, Risk assessment, Risk management, Sustainability Will Nasdaq’s Diversity Rules Harm Investors? [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Liekefett, Vinson & Elkins LLP, on Thursday, December 22, 2016 Tags: Agency costs, Boards of Directors, Duty of loyalty, Engagement, Golden leashes, Hedge funds, Incentives, Institutional Investors, Investor horizons, Long-Term value, Proxy contests, Proxy fights, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder value, Short-termism, Target firms [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm by administrator
[v] Elkin Abramowitz and Peter Scher, The Hyde Amendment: Congress Creates a Toehold for Wrongful Prosecution, 22 Champion 22 (1998). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am by Kate Howard
§ 2254(d) permits a federal court to ignore the reasoning of the state court and substitute its own reasons for denying relief and whether the violent nature of the crime lessens the prejudice from unconstitutional shackling. [read post]
8 May 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “Instead, I’d expect us to have a mature conversation about the issue up front. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
Thompson III at Vinson & Elkins in Houston and Daniel J. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vinson & Elkins’ Lincoln’s Law Blog, John Elwood and others look at a new cert petition in a False Claims Act case. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:00 pm by law shucks
After their sanctions were overturned, the trial court decided they’d had enough and decided not to re-impose. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:45 am by Jonathan Bailey
The detectives spoke with Carl and Katya’s editor, Ben Elkins, who supported that Carl was away at the time. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am by John Elwood
§ 206(d)(1)—a prior salary is a “factor other than sex”; and (2) whether deceased judges may continue to participate in the determination of cases after their deaths. [read post]