Search for: "Daniel v. Paul"
Results 141 - 160
of 848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:09 am
On June 25, 1984, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the decision for a unanimous court. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 11:51 am
Harvie Wilkinson and Paul Niemeyer. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Horrifying images of George Floyd dying on a Minneapolis street while a police officer knelt on his neck have sparked peaceful protests and rioting throughout the country. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[15] On a positive note, some courts have recognized that responding with the conclusory assessment of a challenge’s going to weight not admissibility is a delegation of the court’s gatekeeping duty to the jury.[16] In 2018, Professor Daniel Capra, the Reporter to the Rules Committee addressed the “weight not admissibility dodge” at length in his memorandum to the Rules Committee: “Rule 702 clearly states that these are questions of admissibility, but… [read post]
26 May 2020, 7:00 am
Daniels then appealed that ruling to the 9th Circuit.9th Circuit - Towle TestThe 1966 BatmobileThe 9th Circuit addressed the limited copyright protection that may be afforded to graphically-depicted characters of fictional works in 2015, in DC Comics v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 1:31 pm
Here are some excerpts from Judge Daniel C. [read post]
21 May 2020, 10:56 am
By Daniel Standing LL.B., Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Booking.com, which asks whether the addition of “.com” to a generic term creates a protectable trademark, and Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
At Slate, David Gans argues that “[t]he sweeping arguments for a total religious exemption” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:05 am
Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2000.Burston, Daniel. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 7:03 am
New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Callahan, Daniel. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
The proposal that caught Maryland lawmakers’ eye, developed by distinguished economist Paul Romer, was not intended to tax all digital advertising, just a subset deemed exploitative. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
The Myth of the Privacy Paradox, Daniel J. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:30 am
Paul R. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:14 am
” The first episode is titled “Bush v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm
Danielle Hindley is a chatty beautician aged 34 who lives in the former mining village of Kippax, near Leeds. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Lytton, Daniel Salmon & Saad B. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:27 am
This blog post looks at an interesting FINRA arbitration award issued on January 7, 2020: Daniel Paul Motherway v. [read post]
