Search for: "David Feldman"
Results 141 - 160
of 472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman compares several aspects of Gorsuch’s confirmation hearing to those of all previous nominees to the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the justices’ relative power over time, comparing cases that were decided by a one-vote margin, and concluding that Chief Justice William Rehnquist is “the clear leader. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 10:05 pm
Joan Feldman of Attorney at Work discusses app updates and other tech news announced at ABA TECHSHOW earlier this month. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:42 am
Tom Harkin and Eve Hill in the Des Moines Register, At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes “various linguistic aspects of some senior senators’ preliminary remarks from recent confirmation hearings” and suggests that the trends he identifies may become “even more pronounced in the Gorsuch hearings. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:29 pm
Early commentary comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Some commentators have not clearly distinguished Trump’s authority to restrict federal funds from Congress’s authority to do so, instead conflating the two under the “federal government” umbrella (see Noah Feldman’s argument for the order’s unconstitutionality and David Rivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley’s argument to the contrary). [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
’” In an op-ed in The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), David Rudenstine asserts that Gorsuch’s espousal of originalism “disqualifies him from becoming a Supreme Court justice,” because “originalism fails to be descriptive of more than 200 years of Supreme Court history and makes promises that cannot be kept,” and that by embracing it, Gorsuch “knowingly misleads the American public as to the scope of… [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am
” In an essay in the Stanford Law Review Online, David Freeman Engstrom and Jonah Gelbach discuss California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:07 pm
The moderator was Andrew Feldman. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:18 am
” In the wake of the court’s release of its April argument calendar, Adam Feldman looks at the lawyers who have argued or will argue before the court this term in Empirical SCOTUS, concluding that “the pattern of experienced litigators arguing multiple cases each term appears a fixture of the modern Court. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:01 am
” At Casetext, David Boyle argues that current events show “that this may not be a good time for the Supreme Court in Lee v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
Feldman, 81 Brooklyn L. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
Commentary comes from the editorial board of The New York Times; Advice and Consent (podcast); Ryan Owens in the Washington Examiner; Mark Pulliam at American Greatness, who focuses on the confirmation battle ahead; the editorial board of Bloomberg View, which also published op-eds by Stephen Carter and Noah Feldman; David Cohen of Rolling Stone; Ken Jost at Jost on Justice; Frank Bruni in The New York Times; J. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am
” Another discussion of Expressions comes from Noah Feldman, who argues in a column for Bloomberg View that “it seems bizarre to ban merchants from telling their customers that in effect they are paying a credit-card surcharge by declining the cash discount. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:07 pm
David G. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am
” At ArsTechnica, David Kravets surveys the First Amendment cases on the court’s docket this term. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
Noah Feldman in Bloomberg has looked at how libellous fake news might be dealt with in America. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 7:08 pm
" David G. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the changing nature of Supreme Court cases involving the “scope of executive power,” looking at past cases, as well as past and pending cert petitions, to assess how such questions might arise in relation to a Donald Trump presidency. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, David Alan Slansky recoils at the idea that policymakers debating possible responses to the threat of terrorism have described the court’s notorious decision in Korematsu v. [read post]
