Search for: "David V. Arnold"
Results 141 - 160
of 312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
Here are the results, presented by David.* Are you a new IP lawyer in search of a network? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
David Llewellyn: Weatherall’s point about lost bearings w/reality is worth reinforcing. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:14 am
The 13 May ruling of the UK Supreme Court in Starbucks (HK) and another v British Sky Broadcasting Group was well summarized by fellow Kat David Brophy. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Now the facts: David Lenio posted many Twitter messages that mentioned killing. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
* Warner-Lambert v Actavis; the Court of Appeal has its say on second medical use claims in the UKIPKat readers who have followed this saga will know that, earlier this year, Mr Justice Arnold gave the first detailed consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means [see blog posts here and here]. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
Arnold of Garvey, Schubert & Barer. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
David tells all.* 14 million reasons to say "thank you"The IPKat weblog reaches its 14 millionth page view. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
Last Wednesday, fellow Kat David performed an astonishing feat in posting a full and detailed account of the UK Supreme Court's hot-off-the-press ruling in Starbucks v British Sky Broadcasting almost before the ink was dry on this seminal case and probably well before their Lordships had replaced the cork in the bottle of their pre-prandial sherry. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
What is this for, wonders David? [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
HAVENNER, Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
The attorneys were: Tracy Essig, Essig Law David Jojola, Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold Derek Kaczmarek, Frazer Ryan Goldberg & Arnold Eliot Kaplan, Squire Patton Boggs Robert Lord, Robert J. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
His attorney, David Stanziale, told ABC News that the property is now going through foreclosure. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
A big decision from a big Board, says David. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:57 pm
Arnold Schecter and Dr. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
*Goodbye to “protective” trade marks: a change in SpainKatfriends and IP enthusiasts David Pellisé and Juan Carlos Quero explain a revolutionary trade mark decision from the Spanish Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:05 pm
" These "negative" forces include predicted secondary market "chaos" resulting from the Washington Square v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Arnold, Pender & Coward, P.C., Suffolk, Virginia, and Brandee L. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process claims. [read post]
