Search for: "Davidoff v Davidoff"
Results 141 - 160
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2009, 9:20 am
Syst. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 9:20 am
Syst. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
Singga Enterprises (Canada) Inc.; Tory Burch LLC, et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
(Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Hill Times features op-ed by Michael Geist concerning copyright lobby recycling (Michael Geist) Owner of Glo Salon and Spa sues former employees now working at competitor for $6.4 million in damages over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in the form of client lists and client colour cards (IP Osgoode) Federal court issues practice direction aimed at streamlining complex litigation (International Law Office) China Get involved in Chinese IP policy… [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
Cook, Frank Davidoff, “Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence,” 126 Ann. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Scheinkman (pictured) in Perry v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:53 am
Steve Davidoff and I wrote about it here. 2. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 6:07 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 Tags: Conflicts of interest, Glass Lewis, Institutional Investors, ISS, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, Rule 14a-8, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals The Myth of Morrison: Securities Fraud Litigation Against Foreign Issuers Posted by Steven Davidoff Solomon (UC Berkeley School of Law), on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 … [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
Scheinkman (pictured) in Perry v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm
” Davidoff & Ors v (i) Dhir Doshi and (ii) Thomas Govan [Claim No. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP tango) ECJ sets aside partial refusal to grant CTM for ‘Vorsprung durch Technik’ (progress through technology): Audi AG v OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) (The IP Factor) ECJ: Davidoff criteria for exhaustion apply also if goods were first marketed within the EEA: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV and others v Diesel SpA (JIPLP) Time for a general grumble - General Court decisions missing images, no English version: G-Star Raw Denim kft v OHIM, ESGW… [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
On 4 July 2023, Heather Williams J heard preliminary arguments and a strike out application in Davidoff v Hargrave. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
See Malpiede v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:37 am
Selectica, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:17 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:05 am
The usual pundits are commenting - Steve Davidoff of M&A Prof Blog and the New York Times Dealbook did us all a service by posting the Bear Stearns - J.P. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:35 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
DiNapoli, Office of New York State Comptroller, on Sunday, June 16, 2019 Tags: Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, New York, Pension funds, Stewardship, Sustainability Mootness Fees Posted by Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley), on Monday, June 17, 2019 Tags: Class actions, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers… [read post]
