Search for: "Dept of Corrections"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Posted on Civil Rights Blog / Blog / Fact Check: Do Police Have a Duty To Protect Individuals Fact Check: Do Police Have a Duty To Protect Individuals? [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm
Police dept. to public: It was an armed standoff! [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
Matter of Ventillo v County of Rockland Sheriff's Dept. 2022 NY Slip Op 03521 Decided on June 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
Matter of Ventillo v County of Rockland Sheriff's Dept. 2022 NY Slip Op 03521 Decided on June 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
Matter of Ventillo v County of Rockland Sheriff's Dept. 2022 NY Slip Op 03521 Decided on June 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
Matter of Ventillo v County of Rockland Sheriff's Dept. 2022 NY Slip Op 03521 Decided on June 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:03 am
The Michigan Dept. of Labor and Economic Opportunity (LEO) established a dedicated workgroup to focus on mental health, trauma, and resiliency in the workplace. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:57 am
Libra also argued that Adam’s amended complaint, viewed as a whole, alleged no more than a mere disagreement over the correct direction of ALP’s business, decisions shielded by the common-law business judgment rule. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
Montana Dept. of Revenue, involving state constitution prohibitions on state aid to "sectarian" institutions, explained that in the 19th century, "sectarian" was not a synonym for "religious. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Pataki, 259 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1999], lv dismissed and denied 93 NY2d 993 [1999]; Matter of McGuinn v City of New York, 219 AD2d 489, 490 [1995], lv dismissed and denied 87 NY2d 966 [1996]; Matter of Cassidy v New York City Dept. of Correction, 95 AD2d 733, 734-735 [1983]; Matter of Serth v New York State Dept. of Transp., 79 AD2d 801, 802 [1980]). [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:21 pm
Alcoholic Beverage Control Dept., 237 Va. 192, 201 (1989). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Rather, said the court, Civil Service Law §75-b prohibits a public employer from dismissing or taking any "other disciplinary or other adverse personnel action against a public employee regarding the employee's employment" because the employee discloses information of either: (1) a violation of rule or law which presents a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety, or (2) improper governmental action (see Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept.… [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Rather, said the court, Civil Service Law §75-b prohibits a public employer from dismissing or taking any "other disciplinary or other adverse personnel action against a public employee regarding the employee's employment" because the employee discloses information of either: (1) a violation of rule or law which presents a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety, or (2) improper governmental action (see Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept.… [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
Hobbs, the Court considered the application of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) to a claim by a prisoner who had religious grounds for growing a beard in violation of an Arkansas Dept of Corrections grooming policy. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The United State Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, opining that New York law offered "conflicting guidance" on the issue, certified the following question to New York State's Court of Appeals: "Does the 'special duty' requirement — that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally — apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal… [read post]
