Search for: "Directional Project Support, Inc."
Results 141 - 160
of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
"Access the complete opinion and separate concurring opinion (click here).Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The project supports a cleaner and safer waterway in the Delta. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 2:48 pm
The Town Board, as the lead agency, "may require a supplemental EIS, limited to the specific significant adverse environmental impacts not addressed or inadequately addressed in the EIS that arise from: (a) changes proposed for the project; or (b) newly discovered information; or (c) a change in circumstances related to the project" (6 NYCRR 617.9 [a] [7] [i]; Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Town of Southeast, 9 NY3d at 231). [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 2:48 pm
The Town Board, as the lead agency, "may require a supplemental EIS, limited to the specific significant adverse environmental impacts not addressed or inadequately addressed in the EIS that arise from: (a) changes proposed for the project; or (b) newly discovered information; or (c) a change in circumstances related to the project" (6 NYCRR 617.9 [a] [7] [i]; Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v Planning Bd. of Town of Southeast, 9 NY3d at 231). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
In April, the Association’s Board directed its consultant to assess the viability of the Class 23 exemption for approving the deputy sheriff’s request. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:02 pm
Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:56 am
A good example of this effort in a professional capacity is the dogged efforts of both MTFA Architecture, Inc. and Bean, Kinney & Korman to support the Views at Clarendon project from its infancy through its various waves of litigation and finally on through funding at the start of construction. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Fourth, the trial court ruled that the EIR’s assessment of the project’s impact on Native-American cultural resources was not supported by substantial eviden [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
” (Citing Napa Valley Wine Train, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Despite Golden Gate’s objections, the Park District Board adopted the resolution of necessity and directed staff to file and post a notice of exemption pursuant to Section 15325 of the CEQA Guidelines. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 11:53 am
Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., which held that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the FHA. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
The Supreme Court granted review and ultimately concluded that CEQA directs lead agencies to analyze the impact of the project on the environment, not the other way around. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:12 am
United South & Eastern Tribes, Inc. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:53 am
The employee characterized this as a “classic case of projection” and asserted that it was sufficient evidence of discriminatory animus. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 6:50 am
Nova Group, Inc., 2021 WL 3174799 (W.D. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm
THE ALTMAN GROUP, INC. [read post]
