Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division" Results 141 - 160 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
  On 22 July 2012, in accordance with the Service Agreement, the fifth pursuer gave the defender twelve months notice of the termination of his employment. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The loan/bonus proportionately transformed into debt when the husband left his employment prior to December 2021. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:31 am by Dean Freeman
Pacific Coast Elevators , March 10, 2015, California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One More Blog Entries: Sutherland v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 7:58 pm
  On August 13, 2008, the New Jersey Appellate Division posted to its website in the "unpublished decisions" section a ruling in the case of Darren Kwiatkowski v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:12 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming, the New York Appellate Division reasoned that because his own doctor determined he could not spend time in the field, he could not perform an essential function of his position. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:28 am
Appointing authority is entitled to rely upon the findings of its own medical personnel when qualifying an applicant for employmentMatter of City of New York v New York City Civ. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
Not by the standards of his employers or colleagues, if different. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 3:34 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
These developments place all employers covered by the Act in a very difficult position. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:10 am
But, the injury happened while Straube was on the job and the employer takes an employee as he finds him. [read post]